The Gospel in Nonviolence: 'A True Story'

The Gospel in Nonviolence

The Gospel in Nonviolence

The following is a true story that clearly demonstrates the essence of the gospel in nonviolence. I wept in thankfulness the first time I read this. It is an incident cited by Kenneth Bailey[i] involving King Hussein of Jordan, and confirmed through high-ranking American intelligence officers stationed in Jordan at the time this event took place:

One night in the early 1980’s, the king was informed by his security police that a group of about seventy-five Jordanian army officers were at that very moment meeting in a nearby barracks, plotting a military overthrow of the kingdom. The security officers requested permission to surround the barracks and arrest the plotters. After a somber pause the king refused and said, “Bring me a small helicopter.” A helicopter was brought. The king climbed in with the pilot and himself and flew to the barracks and landed on its flat roof. The king told the pilot, “If you hear gun shots, fly away at once without me.”

Unarmed, the king then walked down two flights of stairs and suddenly appeared in the room where the plotters were meeting and quietly said to them:

“Gentlemen, it has come to my attention that you are meeting here tonight to finalize your plans to overthrow the government, take over the country, and install a military dictator. If you do this, the army will break apart and the country will be plunged into civil war. Tens of thousands of innocent people will die. There is no need for this. Here I am! Kill me and proceed. That way only one man will die.”

After a moment of stunned silence, the rebels as one, rushed forward to kiss the king’s hand and feet and pledge loyalty to him for life.

King Hussein opted for total vulnerability at the hands of those who wanted him dead. He chose nonviolence, up to the point of his own death, for the country he loved, and for those who wanted him dead.

My friends, if a son of Adam can demonstrate the gospel so clearly in nonviolence, why do we attribute less to the Son of Man and His Father? Why do we need a vengeful and retributive God who somehow endorses violence to either “satisfy his holiness and justice” or some other perceived requirement in His nature? No. In the atonement, God our Father, has in Christ, reconciled the world to Himself. The One has absorbed the violence of the many, for the sake of the many, and in so doing, renounced the efficacy of violence forever, and the many fall down and worship Him when they see it for what it is.

Oh, that we would see it and make this kind of love known to others. This is the gospel of the Lord Jesus Christ.


[i] Kenneth E. Bailey, Jesus Through Middle Eastern Eyes. Downers Grove: IVP Academic, 2008, page 418.


Copyright 2014,  Dr. Stephen R. Crosby, Permission is granted to copy, forward, or distribute this article for non-commercial use only, as long as this copyright byline, in totality, is maintained in all duplications, copies, and link references.  For reprint permission for any commercial use, in any form of media, please contact
This ministry is not a 501-C-3 corporation (click here to know why) and is sustained by the freewill offerings of those believe in the message of a radical grace in a new covenant understanding. If this article has been a blessing to you, would you prayerfully consider making contribution through our Paypal button to help? Thank you and God bless you.

5 comments on “The Gospel in Nonviolence: 'A True Story'

  1. Steve, Are you suggesting a pacifist response to violent threat and aggression? The story you relate is a good illustration of a pragmatic and self-sacrificial way to prevent the blood shed of many innocent citizens. I suspect that within his culture, though he was taking a great risk, he could also have anticipated this possible outcome. Your comments bring up a subject of whether or not self-defense is biblical and what is he place of the agents of God in retribution and justice stated in Romans 13. Can a police officer be a Christian and defend himself and others from violent men? Should a Christian who is about to be persecuted call upon armed policemen for protection? Should a Christian pursue justice through the courts to right wrongs committed against him and his loved ones? Can a father protect his family with an armed response from a home invasion of men he suspects may plunder, rape and kill his family?

    • Hi Alan, you are right. His actions incurred great personal risk. I am not making any statement at all about pacifism, self-defense, etc. I am presenting this as an incarnate image of the atonement from a non-violent perspective. That is all.

  2. People are so afraid of the possible outcome of conscientious objection of violence because of the imagined possibility of harm to others that they take it into their hands to perform definite physical violence against a possibility. While I agree that the possibility may have a high probability, it is still just a possibility. When we cannot fathom that God will protect our selves and our loved ones, when we believe it is probable that He will not intervene on our behalf, then we take force, often lethal force, into our own hands and respond to the threat with violence. Sadly, few believers see what is actually happening to our theology when this happens; we demonstrate that God is not trustworthy, we articulate that God wants us to take care of ourselves instead of waiting on Him.

  3. Stephen, as you know I’m responding under a different circumstance from the comments already made. King Hussein certainly displayed the very nature of the Son of God. We don’t know how we would respond until we are placed into a similar situation. My goal is to allow Him to live His life in me.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *